LIST OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
According to the methodology of the PEROSH Clearinghouse of Systematic Reviews
Study Grading (according to SIGN: ++/+/-)
|1.||Kolstad HA. Nightshift work and risk of breast|
cancer and other cancers- a critical review of
the epidemiologic evidence. Scandinavian
Journal of Work, Environment & Health 2008
Feb. 34(1): 5-22.
|2.||Erren TC, Pape HG, Reiter RJ, Piekarski C.|
Chronodisruption and cancer.
Naturwissenschaften 2008 May; 95(5): 367-82
|3.||Megdal SP, Kroenke CH, Laden F, Pukkala E,|
Schernhammer ES. Night work and breast
cancer risk: A systematic review and metaanalysis.
European Journal of Cancer 2005 Sep.
* Study grading (according to the adopted SIGN Checklist for PEROSH Clearinghouse of Systematic Reviews):
++ All or most of the criteria have been fulfilled. Where they have not been fulfilled the conclusions of the study or review are thought very unlikely to alter.
+ Some of the criteria have been fulfilled. Those criteria that have not been fulfilled or not adequately described are thought unlikely to alter the conclusions.
– Few or no criteria fulfilled. The conclusions of the study are thought likely or very likely to alter.
For search details see Search documentation form